Luxottica Group S.p.A. Sues Online Sellers Over Trademark Infringement
The topic at hand: Luxottica Group S.p.A. sues online sellers over trademark infringement. For that reason, your e-commerce business is getting held back by a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). Naturally, without having access to your online seller funds, you are unable to fully operate, which is a huge inconvenience. To this end, you must address the allegations posited by Luxottica against you, meaning, you need to respond to the legal notice.
Case No. 22-cv-04578, Luxottica Group S.p.A: How To Respond to Temporary Restraining Orders
In the first place, know that Luxottica is claiming that your e-commerce store offered counterfeit Ray-Ban, Oakley, Persol, and Costa eyewear to unknowing customers in the United States. Secondly, the lawsuit further specifies that it is focused on Amazon, Wish.com, eBay, DHgate, AliExpress, Walmart, and Alibaba sellers. Moreover, due to these claims, you will not have access to your accounts or money until you provide a response to the court. ***Failure to respond may result in a default judgment!***
E-Commerce Sellers Sued by Luxottica Group S.p.A: Absolutely Respond to the Notice: Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting
Undoubtedly, you would like to have the TRO removed from your account. We are here to help you! Fear not, as our team of unmatched intellectual property attorneys will work closely with you to unburden you from the disruption of the Temporary Restraining Order. Contact us today for more information on this lawsuit. If you found this content helpful, check out our blog for new weekly updates for e-commerce sellers.
For more content on the same subject, check out Dyson Suing Online Sellers for Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting.
Dyson Suing Online Sellers for Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting
The long and short of it is: Dyson is suing online sellers for trademark infringement and counterfeiting. Needless to say, as an e-commerce seller offering Dyson products, you may be enduring the negative effects of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). What a nuisance! For that reason, you are barred from accessing money earned from the sale of Dyson household appliances.
Please Respond to the Notice! Case No. 22-cv-04546, Dyson Suing for Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement
To explain, Dyson claims e-commerce sellers like you sold counterfeit goods to consumers in the United States. Further, the lawsuit specifies that the platforms used for these transactions are Amazon, eBay, Wish.com, Alibaba, AliExpress, Etsy, and DHgate. Without question, we cannot emphasize how important it is that you provide a response to the court. To put it another way, a lack of a response will not eliminate the TRO and it may very well equate to a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
E-Commerce Sellers Sued by Dyson: The Notice is NOT SPAM!
To conclude, with regard to Case No. 22-cv-04546, it is imperative that you seek the proper legal counsel. Our team of astute intellectual property attorneys will be available to you throughout the entire process. We will dedicate our years of niche experience in this area to providing you with the most effective response strategy. Ultimately, we want what you want: To lift the Temporary Restraining Order affecting your online seller accounts.
Contact us today for more information on this lawsuit. If you found this content helpful, check out our blog for new weekly updates for e-commerce sellers.
Have a moment? Perhaps you’d like to peruse our article on how sellers are also being sued for selling Levi’s!
Levi Strauss & Co. Suing for Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement
Levi’s: counterfeiting and trademark infringement. At the present time, your e-commerce accounts may be frozen due to a lawsuit filed by Levi’s. In effect, the company claims the named defendants are selling unauthorized Levi’s jeans and other apparel. To be sure, the suit was filed by Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd., Case No. 22-cv-03226.
Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. Case No. 22-cv-03226: We Urge You to Respond!
Based on the claims in the lawsuit, you may have a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against your e-commerce accounts. In this case, Levi’s states the defendants “deceive unknowing consumers by using the LEVI’S Trademarks without authorization…” and “engage in fraudulent conduct.” Meanwhile, with the TRO in effect, you are unable to access the funds your business has generated. In short, it is incumbent upon you to take the necessary action.
Levi’s Claiming Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting, Case No. 22-cv-03226
Regardless of whether or not Levi’s claims are true, you should submit an Answer to the court to alleviate yourself of the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), as it relates to Levi’s claiming trademark infringement and counterfeiting. Not to mention, the lack of an Answer could result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Undoubtedly, you will want to respond, for the notice has real-world implications concerning your livelihood and business.
The Notice is Not Spam! Respond to Get the TRO Lifted: Levi Strauss & Co., Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement
We understand that you may be feeling anxious or overwhelmed, but we are on standby to fight on your behalf! Feel free to email our firm or call (718)-657-7400 for more information on this lawsuit. If you found this content helpful, be sure to review our blog weekly for new updates and information for e-commerce sellers.
Perhaps you would like to read about a similar case involving intellectual property and Lululemon!
E-Commerce Sellers Sued by Lululemon, Claims Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement
Lululemon is suing online sellers. As a result of the recent lawsuit, your online accounts may not be accessible to you. The reason for this is what’s known as a Temporary Restraining Order or TRO. Indeed, if the TRO has taken effect, you have already been prevented from touching your hard-earned dollars. According to Lululemon, you may have knowingly offered counterfeit and trademark infringing products to customers throughout the United States.
Absolutely Respond to the Notice: Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. Case No. 22-cv-03706, Lululemon Sues for Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement
Lululemon, the US-Canadian athletic and lifestyle brand, is suing e-commerce sellers for the alleged sale of counterfeit and trademark infringing goods. To further explain, the lawsuit is targeting sellers who depend on digital marketplaces such as eBay, Etsy, Amazon, Wish.com, DHgate, AliExpress, and Alibaba, among others. Given that, you may want to simply ignore the notice, move on with your life and business dealings, and forget about it. However, if you fail to respond to the court, the TRO will maintain its hold on your accounts, causing further disruption. In addition, failure to respond could lead to a default judgment against you.
The Lawsuit is Not Spam: Respond to the Claim That You Are Selling Counterfeit and Trademark Infringing Products: E-Commerce Sellers Sued by Lululemon
Lastly, please, do not worry! Do not be intimidated by the Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. lawsuit Case No. 22-cv-03706. Our team of seasoned and professional intellectual property attorneys will be available to you throughout the entire process. We will meticulously examine the details of your particular case and then develop a response to the notice so as to remove the Temporary Restraining Order from your e-commerce accounts. Contact us today for more information on this lawsuit. If you found this content helpful, check out our blog for new weekly updates for e-commerce sellers.
Read our article regarding Amazon false counterfeit claims, Why Amazon Needs to Do Better!